Better off without? Benefits and costs of resolving goal conflict through goal shelving and goal disengagement

Abstract Pursuing multiple goals with limited time often leads to goal conflicts that can be resolved by prioritizing some pursuits over others. This research examines proximal outcomes of two approaches prioritization: Goal shelving (temporarily withdrawing from a goal) and disengagement (permanently goal). We conducted an experiment ( N = 214) compare motivational emotional consequences resolving conflict through disengagement. Results suggest are similarly effective at reducing different facets experienced conflict, but people regret less than disengaging them. Together, these findings provide first evidence may allow “have their cake eat it too:” reap the benefits prioritization while minimizing its costs.